this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
658 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

59123 readers
2290 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In cloudy conditions, the team estimates the range could be 50 kilometers less.

In other words, the solar only adds about 50-60km/day to the battery.

Another case of putting solar panels on specific things not being a great idea. Chuck the panels on a convenient surface pointing at the sun and connect them to the grid. Connect your load to the grid. Job done.

We can talk about solar windows/roads/cars/rivers/canopies when we've run out of space on houses and commercial roofs. They already have grid connections, structure, and are protected from damage.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the solar only adds about 50-60km/day to the battery.

How do you say that so nonchalantly

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Compared to the 700km claimed range (which seems very optimistic), that implies you would need to let the car sit for two weeks to charge on solar alone - more if the weather is not totally perfect or there is any shade.

So if you're wanting to do a multi-day road trip, it's of stuff all use. You're going to be relying on the big battery and the grid; the solar is a rounding error.

If you're planning to do <50km/day commuting/shopping etc... please don't get an off-road SUV tank, and probably not anything with 700km of range. Get something that weighs half as much and put 5x as much solar on your roof. It'll still be cheaper overall and the panels will last longer.

If you're actually in the small segment that needs off-road capability and an SUV (say, a farm run-around), congratulations. Definitely don't get a car with solar on the roof because it will immediately be covered in dust, and the minor dents and whoops-a-small-tree-fell-on-it will break the panels in the first year. You also probably want to park it in the shade wherever possible.

Again, stick 5x the panels on the garage roof and get something cheaper.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It can be useful if you live out of the grid, like in the middle of Morocco dessert.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Even if you're off grid, it's still better to put the panels and most of the battery on a house.

You'll get much better yield because the panels can be pointed in exactly the right direction and won't be covered in road dust, plus there's far more space available.

Putting a smaller, lighter battery in the vehicle is going to reduce its energy consumption, as is using a shape designed for low drag rather than a shape set up for optimal solar.