this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
175 points (88.9% liked)

Technology

59421 readers
2819 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 year ago (2 children)

GPS and VHF trackers have been used to stalk people for way longer than AirTags and have zero safeguarding features. And Tile, at least last time I used one, had zero safeguarding features and are pretty just exactly the same product as AirTags.

This all seems a bit frivolous. Are gun makers responsible when their products are misused to murder? Or knife makers?

Seems funny that Apple are the ones getting sued and not the tools of destruction used to end life. It’s like suing the car manufacturer of the car the murderer used to get to the scene.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Here's the thing about all this. Yes, tech existed before airtags. But apple made the tech incredibly accurate, incredibly cheap, and marketed the hell out of it.

On top of that, the protection features have been massively lacking, especially around people who do not use iPhones.When they first came out, a few companies did tests on their employees around air tags. They would slip air tags into their car. The end result was that some people noticed, especially iPhone users. Many did not.

Undoubtedly, there are people dead today who would be alive if airtags didn't exist or if apple had done more.

And yes, we do hold companies up to some level of responsibility. Of course we do.


An edit to say I'm disheartened that so many people are willing to say it's okay, if apple do this. The main complaint is that other tiny companies also make GPS trackers so why should apple be punished for making something that has lead to abuse and death.

We should be collectively holding major corporations to task, not standing up for corporations right to cause harm. Even if they make your favourite phone.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s not like there aren’t any trackers that lack any and all protection. I don’t really see the manufacturer at fault here.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mini GPS trackers have been available for cheap (cheaper than AirTags) for years and they’re practically undetectable. No apps are going to help you there.

Apple built detection features, beeping alarms, and even apps for platforms beyond their own to aid people in not being tracked against their will. Tile didn’t. I don’t know any other trackers that have put as much effort into the problem.

Google wouldn’t implement OS-level features for competitors’ products so people suggesting Apple shouldn’t have launched until their competitors added in support are being unrealistic.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Undoubtedly, there are people dead today who would be alive if hammers didn’t exist or if manufacturers had made them softer.

Undoubtedly, there are people dead today who would be alive if paracetamol didn’t exist or if chemists had done more.

Undoubtedly, there are people dead today who would be alive if cars didn’t exist or if the auto industry didn’t lie for years about the dangers of leaded fuel.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But they have added protection features, unlike virtually every other option. Yet they are the ones being sued? It does not seem fair.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Their protection features did not go nearly far enough and were far too restricted to only apple users. I don't see why apple shouldn't have to be punished for causing harm just because others are too small to notice.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, this type of tech is way more accessible than it was before, which isn't the problem. It's that Apple has not done enough to provide safety to users from airtags if they aren't using an Apple product. This isn't one of those techs that should be gated behind a walled garden because of the potential consequences to unsuspecting targets.

Apple needs to break from their usual walled garden approach when it comes to their tracking technology.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok…and what about the trackers you can buy on Amazon for less than $20 that don’t tell anyone that they’re tracking except the stalker? Do those next. Explain how Apple is at fault for that. I’m almost there.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would the problem be solvable by saying Google needs to break from their approach (do nothing, in this case), and work with Apple to incorporate Apple’s tech into Android by default?

Just trying to think through the finger pointing that happens as we reel in tech.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google already did this.

However, the onus to mitigate problems created by one company shouldn't be their on competitors.

Apple launched AirTags alone, leveraging its massive Find My network, in order to have an immense advantage in the market, and this helped Apple rake in millions and millions of dollars.

It could have coordinated with Google even before the AirTag launch, but this would have probably resulted in missing out on millions in profits. So Apple chose profits over mitigating ethical and moral concerns, and only fixed problems a long time after it started selling the product to customers.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

You’re making some big assumptions. That’s ok, though.

I appreciate the link.

I can sleep knowing Android friends have built-in safety measures, just as I do on an iPhone.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Are gun makers responsible when their products are misused to murder?

It's not really misuse, the intended purpose of a gun is to kill someone/something, that's literally what they are made for.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Kinda similar to AirTags but with tracking things.