this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
127 points (81.6% liked)

Technology

70267 readers
3633 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There might be a lot more millionaires than before, but it’d still be a much smaller number who could drop $1M on a flying car.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's cheaper than a private jet and there are LOADS of them buzzing around polluting the skies.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Way more expensive than most private aircraft, though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm still of an opinion that private aircraft is for sports and for farmers and for doctors\firefighters\rescuers in remote areas like rural Siberia. And, of course, for people wiping their ass with money.

It's unfortunately not the same as having a spaceship in some sci-fi universe. The word "ship" hints why, the legal infrastructure, the expenses and most of all required qualifications make flying a plane more demanding.

I don't see how making a weird car-like plane changes that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

This looks to me like yet another in a surprisingly long line of airplanes that are also designed to be driven on roads in someway, but they’re basically all noticeably worse at either task than vehicles designed specifically for one of those tasks. It also invariably ends up more expensive than two specialized vehicles, so there’s never really any reason to build these.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

That may be true, but private jets are significantly more practical than this. If you've got private jet money, you can just afford to buy a jet and a decent car at your destination.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

With the range of a cessna skyhawk ($400k-$500k aircraft), no way it'll replace a private jet.