this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
40 points (69.2% liked)

Privacy

36797 readers
362 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
40
JWZ weighs in on Signal again (www.jwz.org)
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
82 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

JWZ previously:

See also: Why not Signal?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

If they have such "security concerns" with third-party clients, a compromise would be to mark profiles using unofficial clients, and make it possible to see what client it is. Because it's audacious to disapprove of third-party ones while your own lacks features people find important! Such as:

  • Allowing an arbitrary proxy rather than just their own solution (because not only is their own solution inferior to some of the more advanced censorship-evading technology, but this is the field that needs multiple options when one stops working. Also if a person uses a proxy for everything else anyway, making them set up a whole separate solution or find someone else's proxy just for your app is pointless.
  • UnifiedPush.
  • Allowing tying a desktop client by typing a code rather than scanning a QR code, which is important when registering on an Android VM (because again, Signal just arbitrarily disallows account creation on a desktop, nevermind that most phones are very hard or impossible to make private!)