this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
573 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

68306 readers
4439 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US experts who work in artificial intelligence fields seem to have a much rosier outlook on AI than the rest of us.

In a survey comparing views of a nationally representative sample (5,410) of the general public to a sample of 1,013 AI experts, the Pew Research Center found that "experts are far more positive and enthusiastic about AI than the public" and "far more likely than Americans overall to believe AI will have a very or somewhat positive impact on the United States over the next 20 years" (56 percent vs. 17 percent). And perhaps most glaringly, 76 percent of experts believe these technologies will benefit them personally rather than harm them (15 percent).

The public does not share this confidence. Only about 11 percent of the public says that "they are more excited than concerned about the increased use of AI in daily life." They're much more likely (51 percent) to say they're more concerned than excited, whereas only 15 percent of experts shared that pessimism. Unlike the majority of experts, just 24 percent of the public thinks AI will be good for them, whereas nearly half the public anticipates they will be personally harmed by AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But you're using these billionaires' ai models are you not? Even if you use the free models they still benefit from your profile and query data

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Nope :)

Deepseek GitHub fork ftw

Tax billionaires til they don’t exist ! Or some other way!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep you can run models without giving $$ to tech billionaires!

Now we are giving it to the power billionaires! unless you own your own power sources.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Luckily deep seek uses less power than any locally run models. Can run it on almost any modernish machine

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Meh I like some of the others on hugging face a bit more for coding and such. But its all the same at the end of the day. I do like what you are saying though!

Models + moderate power should be what we strive for. I'm hoping for a star trek ending where we live in a post scarcity world. Im planing on a post apocalypse haha.

Once ASIC chips come out (essentially a specific model on a chip) the amount of power we use will be dramatically less.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

ASIC ai seems like a trouble some thing. Imagine ai powered hacker dongles. Wow.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Its an interesting field! I think the reason we have not gone there is the LLM specific models all have very different models/languages/etc... right now. So the algorithms that create them and use them need flexibility. GPUs are very flexible with what they can do with multiprocessing.

But in 5 years (or less) time, I can see a black box kinda system that can run 1000x+ speed that will make GPU LLMs obsolete. All the new GPU farm places that are popping up will have a rude awakening lol.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Uhm, I guess you missed the news when it was revealed that Deepseek had a little more backing than they claimed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah they were sponsored

But the code is open sourced.

So

FOSS FTW

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Will have a look, thx.