this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
623 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59347 readers
5305 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
623
Solar power and storage prices have dropped almost 90% (interestingengineering.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
144 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Solar power and storage prices have dropped almost 90%::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Maybe I missed some points by skimming, but the arguments made in that article are that:

  • 1 Australian researcher agrees with his stance

  • a region had 22% of its power produced by wind at one point

I guess the claim "it can be argued" is technically proven true, but the majority opinion I keep hearing from the electrical grid engineers in the news is the opposite

And, well, sometimes it just simply is night, and sometimes the wind doesn't blow. We don't have the battery tech to run from storage alone

But, honestly why wouldn't we use nuclear? It's the one power source we have without any real downsides untill ITER finally brings positive results

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

And, well, sometimes it just simply is night, and sometimes the wind doesn’t blow.

Do you really think this isn't already taken into account?

We don’t have the battery tech to run from storage alone

Nobody is making that argument, as far as I'm aware. There are plenty of ways of storing energy, e.g. pumped hydro, that would work in conjunction with battery storage.

But, honestly why wouldn’t we use nuclear?

The obvious one. It's wildly expensive when compared to renewables, and that's before the usual nuclear build issues of cost and schedule overruns.