this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
1617 points (99.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

21108 readers
1082 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 111 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (9 children)

Regex

Edit: to everyone who responded, I use regex infrequently enough that the knowledge never really crystalizes. By the time I need it for this one thing again, I haven't touched it in like a year.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 4 days ago

You get used to it, I don't even see the code—I just see: group... pattern... read-ahead...

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Most of regex is pretty basic and easy to learn, it's the look ahead and look behind that are the killers imo

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

(?=) for positive lookahead and (?!) for negative lookahead. Stick a < in the middle for lookbehind.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You always forget regex syntax?

I've always found it simple to understand and remember. Even over many years and decades, I've never had issues reading or writing simple regex syntax (excluding the flags and shorthands) even after long regex breaks.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (5 children)

It's not about the syntax itself, it's about which syntax to use. There are different ones and remembering which one is for which language is tough.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

This is exactly it. Regex is super simple. The difficulty is maintaining a mental mapping between language/util <-> regex engine <-> engine syntax & character class names. It gets worse when utils also conditionally enable extended syntaxes with flags or options.

The hardest part is remembering whether you need to use \w or [:alnum:].

Way too few utils actually mention which syntax they use too. Most just say something accepts a "regular expression", which is totally ambiguous.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

This is exactly it. Regex is super simple. The difficulty is maintaining a mental mapping between language/util <-> regex engine <-> engine syntax & character class names. It gets worse when utils also conditionally enable extended syntaxes with flags or options.

The hardest part is remembering whether you need to use \w or [:alnum:].

Way too few utils actually mention which syntax they use too. Most just say something accepts a "regular expression", which is totally ambiguous.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

This is exactly it. Regex is super simple. The difficulty is maintaining a mental mapping between language/util <-> regex engine <-> engine syntax & character class names. It gets worse when utils also conditionally enable extended syntaxes with flags or options.

The hardest part is remembering whether you need to use \w or [:alnum:].

Way too few utils actually mention which syntax they use too. Most just say something accepts a "regular expression", which is totally ambiguous.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

This is exactly it. Regex is super simple. The difficulty is maintaining a mental mapping between language/util <-> regex engine <-> engine syntax & character class names. It gets worse when utils also conditionally enable extended syntaxes with flags or options.

The hardest part is remembering whether you need to use \w or [:alnum:].

Way too few utils actually mention which syntax they use too. Most just say something accepts a "regular expression", which is totally ambiguous.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I give you that, true. I wish vim had PCRE

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

There is the "very magic" mode for vim regexes. It's not the exact PCRE syntax, but it's pretty close. You only need to add \v before the expression to use it. There is no permanent mode / option though. (I think you can remap the commands, like / to /\v)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

https://regex101.com/

Don't let the gatekeepers keep you out. This site helps.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Nice! This is the one I use: https://regexr.com/
Though it appears to be very similar on the face of it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

This is one of the best uses for LLM’s imo. They do all my regex for me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No. Learn it properly once and you're good. Also it's super handy in vim.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

interns gonna intern

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I just use the regex101 site. I don't need anything too complicated ever. Has all the common syntax and shows matches as you type. Supports the different languages and globals.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

For me I spent one hour of ADHD hyper focusing to get the gist of regex. Python.org has good documentation. It’s been like 2 years so I’ve forgotten it too lol.