this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
476 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

34815 readers
172 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, ok, hold on - what's being sold here? A link to a digital asset or something else? If it's a link, I still don't get the point. Does that link (or whatever it is) confer some kind of license? What's the use case for faking this data and why are we defending from this?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My idea is that the art is being sold and the NFT only says who owns it. It doesn’t need to be digital art, it can be just about anything where an original creator should benefit from the item changing hands.

Whenever the NFT changes hands, there are fees associated, which would include a portion of the sale going to the original artist, a royalty. And because the NFT exists on a publicly visible blockchain, back alley sales can’t happen ensuring that the artist gets paid.

This type of thing helps ensure that artists benefit from their art going into demand and increasing in value.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Blockchain mathematically guarantees trust... for info stored on the blockchain. What guarantee do you have that this info matches things that happen in reality?

If you say: we need a social contract to ensure people update the blockchain, then I say: that defeats the purpose of the heavy lifting you need to mathematically guarantee info on the blockchain is genuine. Let's just have a social contact to pay the artist when appropriate.

I don't see what other way could exist to keep the blockchain and reality in sync.