this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
173 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
7113 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
173
Carbon Capture Tech Hype Is Fizzling Out, IEA Says (gizmodo.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If not burning it were an option, we'd be doing that. But we aren't, so it isn't.

So we need to do something with the stuff in the air..

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Not burning it is an option though.

..it's just cheaper not to. If you ignore the externalities for it. Which we do.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah but when running carbon capture produces more CO2 than it can remove it is no point, its like running an air condition without exhausting the hot air.