Fediverse

30302 readers

886 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Posts must be on topic.
Be respectful of others.
Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

199

Defaults are crucial for good UX and getting more users on the Fediverse (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

85 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Small things like 'Auto expand media' being set to true, can have a huge impact on user retention rate.

The vast majority of people never open or change default settings in the social media they use.

When they try out Lemmy etc., and the defaults aren’t great a lot of them will have a bad User Experience and leave.

I’m a IT professional, and joined Lemmy a few months ago, the UX sucked, most of that could have been fixed by having good defaults in place.

I powered through, but I won’t recommend Lemmy to many of my friends or family because I know they will give up due to too much friction in finding the right settings and how things work.

For the Fediverse to succeed focus needs to be put on giving people a very smooth UX from first opening a app or page, to finding enjoyment seeing and engaging with content.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Mastodon: When you block someone they no longer can interact with you or your content Lemmy: When you "block" someone they can mine your content forever

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Nothing you can really do about preventing someone from looking at your posts unless you make your profile private, and I don't think Lemmy has that concept.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah also the blocking instances capabilities on Lemmy are a fucking joke
Block an instance at user level? You still have to deal with their users and you see crossposts
Defederate an instance? You still see their crossposts if someone from another instance does it
What part of that counts as blocking? It should be as nuclear as possible, that's what blocking is for, because someone doesn't want anything to do with them.

Also I know Lemmy is not private, but not being able to completely delete posts/comments still irks me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

But it's all public, right? You can't block people from seeing stuff you post publicly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can you explain?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I think they're complaining that Lemmy uses the older method of blocking instead of the more modern version.

The old way of blocking is that you don't want to see a person, but they're still free to do what they want. It's just not shown to you. So they can still read everything you post and downvote or reply to it as they please.

The modern way is to prevent the blocked user from interacting with you at all, including seeing your posts.

I don't use Lemmy, so I don't know which it uses, but it sounds like OP is arguing that Mastodon uses the latter but Lemmy uses the former. Reddit used to do the former but eventually changed to the latter.