this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
188 points (92.3% liked)

Technology

59312 readers
4597 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Telegram has the best clients ever. But those clients need to connect to something and this is where we encounter a big problem.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But isn't that the whole point of a messaging service? Connect to something else that's not local and have your messages exchanged?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think smileyhead is alluding to the fact that Telegram servers are not open source, just the clients are.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why would it matter if the servers are open source? How would you ever verify they are running the exact build they claim they are?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It's not about what build they are running. It matters because somebody just glancing at it might misinterpret the situation as "Telegram is open source", but it actually isn't because the server isn't. Just some clients are, which is pretty useless if you can't run a server to talk to them. Just for arguments sake, let's say Telegram gets busted tomorrow in an international sting operation and all their servers get taken offline. The clients will be entirely useless at that point, somebody would have to reverse engineer the server.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'd like to at the very least be able to run my own server. Not even necessarily federated with the original ones. Just run my own instance if I don't trust the main one runs what they claim.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

By running it myself, duh.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For whatsapp nothing is opensource

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's kind of an apples an oranges comparison, WhatsApp doesn't even try to present a facade of being open source. Telegram does, betting that the distinction between server and client code will go over most peoples heads, which it probably does to be honest.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There are two realistic alternatives with hundreds of millions of users. Whatsapp has a closed source client, Telegram has an open source one. The choice for me is easy.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That sounds like a false dichotomy and I'm not sure why you even think the number of users is relevant. Why not choose something fully open source?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because there is no alternative that is on my friends phone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That sounds like a solvable problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Not open source, centralized servers that store messages mostly without E2EE. By using Telegram we are locking ourself in situation where they can turn the knobs as they like, while we can't do anything about it.