Technology

60450 readers

5230 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

239

Challenge to Texas age-verification on porn sites comes to Supreme Court. (www.scotusblog.com)

submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A trade group for the adult entertainment industry will appear at the Supreme Court on Wednesday in its challenge to a Texas law that requires pornography sites to verify the age of their users before providing access – for example, by requiring a government-issued identification. The law applies to any website whose content is one-third or more “harmful to minors” – a definition that the challengers say would include most sexually suggestive content, from nude modeling to romance novels and R-rated movies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Fascism wants an internet where you have to verify your identity to use it at all. Capitalists want the same, and they've already built a turnkey totalitarianism mass surveillance precursor to big brother on behalf of neoliberal "democracies". They will 100% finish the job for fascism. This was always the endgame of mass surveillance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 25 minutes ago

I’m a capitalist, and that’s not what I want.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Capitalists shouldn't want the same. You can't sell advertisements with "a million viewers" if you have to be honest about 990k of those being bots.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You're applying very 1990s thinking to internet advertising. They have ways of telling which ads lead to clickthroughs and sales. You say "We got 100 million viewers!" They say "cool, we'll run ads on your program and give you five cents every time the unique link in those ads results in a purchase."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 36 minutes ago

No one is paying per sale. Click through, sure.