this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
78 points (89.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55258 readers
144 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No, but saying to participate and that purchasing software is inherently moral is also fallacious.

Developers, musicians, creatives, actors etc all need to be paid to live in society. However, the current system rewards the lucky few and large corporations as well as the non creative side of media and software creation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No, but that's the case with or without piracy. Artists and devs shouldn't rely on goodwill. That's just expanding the tips system which is already awful.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, I'm not saying artist money is any more immoral than any other purchase. I'm also saying artists should not depend on donations only. I also did not say I exclusively pirate. Don't put words in my mouth.

I'm saying the current system is broken. Replacing it with tips is not the solution. Transport and creative industries will see huge lay offs in the coming years. We need to decide as a society what we value. Is it creating art and pleasure or lines going up on company spreadsheets. Free spread of ideas and art is an ideology. The only reason not to allow it is to profit. Those profits don't go to most artists.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, I didn't as it's not really a post about that, but I think ubinis the way forward.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

sdfhjlaks;fjlk;asfjkl;sfjakl;