this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
54 points (93.5% liked)

Selfhosted

40882 readers
543 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was wondering about the pros and cons about self hosting your services via Yunohost. I currently have all my services hosted in docker containers on a Debian homeserver. As I was planning on a fresh install, setting up an Ansible script to simplify backup & restoring and bake in a centralized user management system (currently I annoyingly have separate passwords for each service for my 5 users).

Now I was wondering if I could get some experience reports from Yunohost users. What are the problems you faced? Are you satisfied? Are there so many services you couldn't find that you rather went the selfhosted way and integrate Authelia or a similar service? Any ideas and feedback is welcome that can help make up my mind.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I tried Yunohost once, and everything worked as long as I stuck to the officially supported apps. The community forum was supportive within reason, and would respond with advice fairly quickly. When I reported an error with an unofficial app, however, I was instantly told off that I shouldn't expect any help.

Now, having used and admined my Linux desktop systems for a decade (without claiming to be an actual sysadmin), I nosed around the system a bit and to my eyes it seemed a right mess of app and user folders, permissions and containers. Surely, a combination of my limited understanding of server apps and a system that is made primarily for GUI use to make administration easier for beginners.

What I mean to say is, if you already run a set of working docker containers, you're probably more advanced than the intended Yunohost user. I was that half ounce more literate that I became frustrated with the GUI-centric setup, and imperial pounds too illiterate to actually muck around in the command line.

Look at it this way, Yunohost offers a fraction of the apps available on Docker, and not all of them are maintained. They do offer a graphic admin interface and out-of-the-box working setups (or did five years ago when I tried it).

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

When I reported an error with an unofficial app, however, I was instantly told off that I shouldn’t expect any help.<

So, you're complaining about a lack of support for an unsupported app? They are actually called 'unsupported'. That's quite a clue.

Also, the catalogue of supported apps is pretty huge now, thanks to a large and enthusiastic community.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

To me it didn't sound like complaining, just sharing that experience.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's the kind of unhelpful condescension I recognise from that "enthusiastic" community. Thanks for the nitpick.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Especially as the nice response is "we've had feedback about that app from too few users to support it, unless you'd like to try".

Or, pretty much any other response.