this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
191 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59390 readers
2532 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The European Commission has re-imposed a fine of around €376.36 million on Intel for a previously established abuse of dominant position in the market for computer chips called x86 central processing units ('CPUs'). Intel engaged in a series of anticompetitive practices aimed at excluding competitors from the relevant market in breach of EU antitrust rules.

With today's decision, we are re-imposing a €376.36 million fine on Intel for having abused its dominant position in the computer chips market. Intel paid its customers to limit, delay or cancel the sale of products containing computer chips of its main rival. This is illegal under our competition rules. Our decision shows the Commission's commitment to ensure that very serious antitrust breaches do not go unsanctioned. - Commissioner Didier Reynders, in charge of competition policy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So EU charges them 400m but then turn around give them 10 billion to build a plant in Germany

Setting up proper incentives ;)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This seems pretty reasonable to me - just because someone gets a parking ticket doesn’t mean they should get their government benefits cut off

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I guess once you accept that legal entities are people subject to preferential treatment by the state, this logic checks out.

Money for buy backs of shares does not come from no where, taxpayers got to pitch in.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)