this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
20 points (95.5% liked)

Selfhosted

40173 readers
1090 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am planning on creating a home server with either 2 (RAID1) or 3 (RAID5) HDDs as bulk storage and 1 SSD as bcache.

The question is, what file system should I use for the HDDs? I am thinking of ext4 or xfs, as I heard btrfs is not recommended for my use case for some reason.

Do you all have some advice to give on what file system to use, as well as some other tips?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Many suggest zfs, I want to spend a word on ext4 instead. Solid, reliable, well proven. Does the job and works pretty well.

Been on ext4 on RAID1 for decades, since it got stable. Never had an issue, except when I borked it by my mistake.

It has maybe less features than zfs, but doesn't need external kernel patches or complex tools, and again its solid, well proven and very stable

Edit: ext4 on top of Linux software raid (mdadm)