this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
641 points (96.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

32375 readers
1464 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Ctrl-K and Ctrl-U in nano, a sane editor that does not hate you

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ctrl-X Ctrl-V in micro, if you appreciate a sane editor with sane keybindings.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

That's cool, and I can't wait for it to gain widespread adoption, but nano is already more commonly installed by default.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How does micro compare to nano?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

better ootb experience with syntax highlighting, sane keybindings, plugin system, and other little things nano lacks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Nano has had syntax highlighting for quite a while.

Its keybindings also make sense if your brain is still stuck in the '90s. If not, they're literally printed at the bottom of the terminal.

If I need plugins, I'm not gonna be fucking around with a terminal text editor.

What are these "other little things?" Certainly not "probably already installed on your system."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Oh, the irony.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Sane" keybindings are questionable given Ctrl's location (painful to press with both pinky and thumb fingers). It's standard, I'll give it that, but those in helix or vim are mostly (I'm looking at you, navigation between splits) much saner all things considered

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

or maps your caps to Ctrl, like vim users map it to esc

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Or build yourself a crkbd, yeah. That's beside the point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Which is exactly where Sun Unix keyboards place it, in a same spot

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Vim doesn't hate you. It loves who you could be.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I wish I could :q! you

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Doesn't that just cut one line at a time? Or is this Emacs-like, where it buffers the lines?

That host doesn't have internet access, though, so installing a different editor wasn't really an option to begin with...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

If the host doesn't already have nano, you fucked up super early

But yeah, it buffers the lines.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Doesn’t that just cut one line at a time?

Move the cursor to the start of what you want to cut, press ALT+A, then move the cursor with arrow keys (you'll see text be highlighted from where the cursor was to where you move your cursor), then once you've moved the cursor to where you want, press CTRL+K to cut.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How do I do regex or connect to an LSP with nano?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's the neat part: you don't.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fair enough. Those are things that I like to be able to use, however. Which makes nano/pico/micro a non-starter for me. Different strokes for different folks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, they're not necessary for 99.999% of what you need a quick CLI text editor for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The use-cases for unquick GUI text editors are merely a subset of those solved by quick TUI text editors :P