this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
76 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
6264 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They didn't name the node size after the guy they named it after the unit since it's approaching sub-nanometer node size.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I literally already wrote that:

I know that Angstrom is the international name of the unit

And I wrote the international name too:

Last I heard Intel claimed that their next process 18Angstrom should be on track and amazing. But as far as I remember they said the same about the current 20Angstrom process.

But the problem isn't Intel, it's the internationalization that was done wrong for some reason, the correct way to internationalize Ångstrøm is Aangstroem.