this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
680 points (86.2% liked)

Memes

45560 readers
2452 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
680
Power Sources (lemmy.zip)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (8 children)

A dam wrecking a valley is a best case scenario. Worst case is thousands dead.

The worst case scenario for a nuclear station is a few dozen dead.

coal ruins the planet.

Also runs the air and water, coal residue is dumped in rivers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I really don't want to play top trumps over which tragic disaster is worse by measuring bodycounts, as this is all way too grim and I think we can agree that the worst case scenarios for all of these things are awful in their own distinct ways. But that number you put for nuclear is difficult to believe. Where did you find it?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

deaths per watt hydroelectric is the worst and nuclear is one of the best

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

jesus-christ I have no idea if that's bullshit or not, but this is definitely turning into a tragic bodycount measuring contest. I'm outta here. peppino-run

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

when talking about safety how many people something has killed is useful information

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)