this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
484 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59312 readers
5006 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

However, it might be interesting to use some sort of verifiable storage format where hashes of checkpoints are distributed elsewhere, so that if someone does manage to get into The Internet Archive, they can't go fiddle with past things without it becoming visible.

Why not use a write only medium, like CDs but obviously bigger capacity. Write once read many kind of thing. It's an archive, it should not be able to be changed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's a thought, though my guess is that access time constraints for something like a CD might mean that it could at most be a secondary form of storage.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

write only medium

I guess you meant "write once"?


Anyway, this won't prevent attacks that somehow swap the CD being read, or the backend logic for where to read the data from.