this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
65 points (97.1% liked)

Selfhosted

40173 readers
1067 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I kind of want to self host a lemmy instance. What are the requirements for a single user lemmy instance?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I did this for a while. However, after subscribing to several groups, there was constant disk activity and it ate network bandwidth. After two months I’ve stopped my server and went back to using a public instance.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure. It's constantly pulling all the posts, comments and likes from potentially hundreds of instances and writing it to it's database to make it accessible to you once you decide to open Lemmy. It'll get updates from the network every few seconds (unless all the Americans are asleep) and that'll cause some database operations on your side.

Concerning the requirements: You'll need some form of server, and probably a domain name. If you're doing it at home, make sure you have a proper IP address and can forward ports. I run a Piefed instance, not Lemmy. It uses a few hundreds of megabytes of RAM and a bit of CPU and disk. It doesn't cache media files as Lemmy does so I can't comment on the storage size. It's 3GB for me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How intensive was it exactly?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I didn’t notice any big drops in network or CPU performance. Usually, because other network traffic had priority. But my server’s HDD constantly rattling along got me thinking that it wasn’t worth it. There are several other containers running on that box and I don’t have that much HDD activity with them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are postgres settings to reduce disk writes. There's a max size and a timeout to write to disk. By default these values are on the lower end I believe.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, but I didn’t want to fiddle with some custom settings. The same official postgres container works great with other apps.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah works good until its under load which federation does have. Matrix and Lemmy both got like 20GB of RAM dedicated to the database on my servers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago