this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
161 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

58115 readers
4097 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Nice to see a pro NT article for a change but there are some details wrong

"It’s true that Unix has attempted to shoehorn other types of non-file objects into the file system"

'Everything is a file' was Unix's design principle from the very start. It wasn't shoehorned in. It is IMO superior to NT's object system in that everything is exposed to the user as the file system rather than hidden behind programming api's.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Agreed.

I skimmed through the article, and see no mention of ~~DEC Alpha~~ VMS, which is NT's predecessor, which is really disappointing. Great read though, very well done.

DOS and Win3.1 really have little to do with NT. A DEC Alpha team was laid off around 1990, MS hired them, and NT is the result. Mark Minasi (I think, may also have been his partner, who's name I can't remember) wrote an article about 1998 in Windows Magazine (NT Magazine?) about it, and broke down the components of both NT and Alpha to demonstrate the similarity.

I've been looking for the article for a couple years now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Alpha was a processor. You’re thinking of VMS.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

You're right. Thanks for the reminder. Memory ain't what it used to be.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Ah, the good old VMS. Did quite some coding on a VAX11/780. Very nice and round OS. NT was basically a VMS clone for Intel. Although I think there was an implementation for the Alpha, too.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

I always thought it was that everything was a file but that everything could be interacted with as if it was a file.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not a kernel dev, but I've read often enough that there are some places where "everything is a file" somewhat breaks down on Unix. (I think /proc and some /dev)

For an "absolutely everything is a file" system have a look at plan9, it was the intended successor to Unix, but then that got popular while plan9 stayed a research project.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I know about 3 people on earth that ever ran it in anything approaching production. Two of them still found a way to use the acme editor til LSPs took over, one is still at it.

It remains a pretty cool project you can still find people maintaining the bones of it. I think the core utils are ported and in the arch repo.