this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
132 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3714 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

FYI, the repo is not DMCAd yet, only the download URL which moved to gitflic.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago (13 children)

I wish there were some quality news media where readers are willing to pay.

All these perverted "we have a right to our revenue even though nobody wants to pay for our shitty product" assholes can go home.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Before I start paying for it I need 1. quality news media 2. journalists are paid instead of CEOs getting millions 3. no op eds from far right radicals.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd go so far as to say no op eds at all. If I'm paying for news, I want factual, high quality, ideally unbiased news, not some chucklefuck's opinion. I can get some chucklefuck's opinion all over the internet for free. (Case in point: You're getting it right now, for free, by reading this comment.)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

I'm on board with this. If it is newsworthy for some reason, factual reporting would be to describe what they said instead of giving a platform to say whatever. Perhaps with (legitimate, fact-based, not just "bothsidesing") commentary on disagreeing viewpoints.

load more comments (10 replies)