this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
647 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59421 readers
2850 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
647
Google Says Opening Up Its App Store Is Expensive And Too Much Work, Gets Told By Judge, 'We're Going To Tear The Barriers Down' (www.benzinga.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
68 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
  • Judge James Donato intends to dismantle Google’s Android app store monopoly, following an earlier ruling declaring it illegal.
  • Google argued that opening its store to competitors would be too costly and complex, but the judge dismissed this claim, emphasizing that barriers will be removed.
  • Proposed remedies include banning discriminatory practices against rival app stores and setting up a committee to monitor compliance and report regularly.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 83 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

It doesn't, although Epic simultaneously sued Apple over this in a separate suit. Their arguments against Google and Apple were different, and in the Apple case the judge sided with Apple on practically every count.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_Games_v._Apple

Notably, the one aspect that was not ruled in Apple's favor was their "anti-steering" policy, which prohibited developers from informing users about different app stores or payment methods within an iOS app. The crux of the ruling boiled down to Apple not having a monopoly over the smartphone market or mobile gaming in general since people can "just" go out and buy an Android device and do business with Google instead (while avoiding mention that Google has near identical policies re: the Play store and takes the same cut of a developer's revenue).

Needless to say, pretty much every sane person on Earth plus a pretty wide spread of other tech companies can clearly see that the ruling in the Epic v. Apple case was complete bullshit, especially in light of this ruling in the Google one.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The judge was probably an Apple fanboy and/or in their pocket.

The amount of times I've heard arguments on Apple forums/news articles being pro-Apple-walled-garden is too high.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I was about to say. Was it even SCOTUS? They could have been frugal and bought the judge a mid-sized SUV instead of an RV.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Google is feeling robbed at the moment. I really want the same judge to dismantle Apple's grip

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just out of curiosity, are you an Apple user, looking for alternatives to Apple's AppStore?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

No. I'm an Android user who wishes for freedom for his (half) brethren who for whatever reason want to use a closed garden