this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
438 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

58151 readers
3747 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

No evidence that UFOs are aliens — NASA attempts to make conversations about aerial phenomena more scientific::NASA attempts to make conversations about aerial phenomena more scientific.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What would be better phrasing? Acknowledged? It was previously classified and denied, and they have now admitted to the existence of the programs and phenomenon.

The information is valid regardless if people want to believe it. My post is thoroughly cited.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's cool man if you want to keep sounding like a dime store Don Quixote. The adversarial subtext of your phrasing will make the majority of people ignore you and will taint the perception of whatever you cite.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, I don't have a problem with my wording. You're just jumping to all sorts of conclusions. I'm not responsible for other people's ignorance and unwillingness to challenge their beliefs.

My argument is logically sound and I don't feel it comes off like the mad scrolls of some Q-anon nut job whatsoever. I think your hang-up and useless criticism here is just a reflection of your emotional maturity level and propensity for emotional reasoning. I presented factual information with logical reasoning. You're emotionally reasoning here.

If someone is unwilling to even open a lemmy post link and instead writes it off without any consideration, that's just a reflection of their own ignorance and unwillingness to challenge their beliefs.

I don't feel the need to tiptoe around the facts, and there's always going to be people unwilling to consider the information. I've already done a hell of a lot, compiling all of that information and that write-up. But I'll be sure to remember that you don't like the way the information makes you feel next time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah I was trying to help ya but it sounds like you might be closer to the mind set that I was trying to help you not sound like.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, what help you were by repeatedly condensing me and calling me a q-anon crazy! You should become a motivational speaker!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I didn't call you that but your responses do lend some credibility to the notion. If you don't want to be taken seriously fine, I don't really care