this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
-17 points (36.9% liked)

Technology

59174 readers
2122 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Right now, sure. But remember that 10 years ago, neural net generated images were putting eyes everywhere, and wouldn't create anything close to a believable photo. I wouldn't be surprised if 10 years from now, video's will have made a similar leap.

On the other hand, I do hope that between now and then, some laws will have been put in place to only train on ethically sourced datasets - which will slow down progress, but is more fair to the creators.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Hard, because the countries are not going to agree and do not want to limit themselves with what could end up harming them in the future.

At least that the international copyright treaties are updated (a titanic task to be fulfilled), but it does not ensure that all countries, organizations, companies or individuals follow and respect the agreements made, especially in developing countries.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

It's definitely cool from that standpoint. Don't get me wrong. But the output from image and video AI usually doesn't impress me all that much. It's technically impressive but the output doesn't surpass what a competent human can do in terms of composition, creativity, and depth. And I know the fear is that eventually it will, but I adamantly believe it never will.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It will depend on how much investment they put into the development and research they do with AI. Because this is a race and for now nobody wants to step on the brakes until there is another winter for AI.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think it will be missing whatever you want to call the human spirit for a long time. It's missing in writing and it's missing in pictures. The technical ability is advancing at an impressive pace, but at the end of the day I find things generated by AI to just feel empty and dull.

I still use them and enjoy them and want to see how far they can go, but I think there is an upper bound that is below human journeyman level until we create a vastly different sort of AI that might surpass sentience and perhaps even be considered sapient. And we're currently far short of sentient.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Also if you actually use AI image gens over a long period you'll find that it creates the same thing over and over. Same poses, same angles.

It all gets very samey, which makes sense