this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
501 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
6264 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/536301

Archived link

The Russia’s State Social University (RSSU) has launched a “social rating” platform that claims to build a person’s “social portrait” with possible applications in future government policies.

Named “We,” the platform promises to determine a user’s comparative “social status” based on a survey that includes questions about income, family status, benefits, creditworthiness, criminal record, lifestyle and state awards, among others.

“The social rating figures don’t affect [a person’s] life, the availability of services or the career trajectory in any way,” RSSU said on the platform’s website. “But who knows what these figures will mean for you in the future?”

Observers on social media compared the platform’s name “We” to the highly influential 1921 dystopian novel of the same name by Russian author Yevgeny Zamyatin. [The novel "We" describes a world of harmony and conformity within a united totalitarian state. It inspired British author George Orwell to write his own novel, "Nineteen Eighty-Four", which was published in 1949.]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

China is about to dive into a shitshow of unseen proportions thanks to its 1 child policy in the past. The Chinese populace is set to shrink to 800 million in the next 50 or so years which will cause a shitload of economical problems for China. It's the single biggest reason why China is prepping to invade Taiwan now because it's either now or never, as in a decade from now it won't be able to financially support said invasion. China could grow like crazy because of its cheap labour but those times are gone. Wages rose, wealth rose, and the advantages they had are gone. Now they will face a rapidly aging work force with way WAY too little people to replace the retirees that need taking care of.

Russia is fucked. If they win the Ukraine Invasion, they are fucked, if they lose it, they are fucked. If they win, they'll get an utterly destroyed country that needs some half trillion dollars of investment to be able to repair itself. Take with that that the Ukrainian people hated eachother before the war, yet now are more United than ever. Russia will face terrorism from there for a long time to come. If they lose, the world will keep blocking them until they pay said billions for Ukrainian repairs, and it will cost Putin his head.

Meanwhile they had a huge outflux of knowledge and experience with loads of capable men fleeing the country to escape roundups to be sent to the front lines. They are currently running a war time economy which keeps them afloat until this war is over, then shit will start hitting fans everywhere.

My take: China will slowly fade to a medium player over the next decades, Russia is on the brink of a heavy collapse. India is a big contender of being the next evil empire with its current leadership being a bunch of extremists.

It would be nice if people toxoukd stop with the imerialistic bullshit and just start caring about all the people in the world. Listen to scientists, elect government officials that are actually responsible. Don't go for crazy growth, it will come back to bite you in the ass.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

China is about to dive into a shitshow of unseen proportions

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ooohhh you must be one of those tankies i keep hearing about...

Lets not read the comment, lets just post a meme..? Great argument.

None of what I said is particularly controversial, the Chinese population distribution is a shitshow in the making. But lets post a meme.

You know what, good boy, you get an extra social point !

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ooohhh you must be one of those tankies i keep hearing about…

the Chinese population distribution is a shitshow in the making

A thing people have been repeating for centuries.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How about: no.

Also how about: even China admits is a shit show, and they're desperately trying to fix the issue by not only loosening the baby laws, they are actively pushing people to have babies and for some "unknown" reason they don't wanna.

Seriously, all toundo is post dumb memes and slogans.

Are you 14 or something? I thought I was talking to an adult but I seem to have been mistaken

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

even China admits is a shit show

Go ahead. Lets see your work. Are you referring to a specific statement or is this bluster?

they’re desperately trying to fix the issue by not only loosening the baby laws, they are actively pushing people to have babies

They've been ratcheting and loosening their One Child Policy (now closer to a 2.3 Child Policy) for half a century. But then so has every other country with a functioning census bureau.

all toundo is post dumb memes and slogans

Westerners were outright panicked about "Overpopulation" for half my adult life. Then the 2008 financial crash happened and someone noticed a change in the second derivative of population trends. And now we get an article a week about how we'll be entirely babyless inside the next generation.

Are you 14 or something?

That would make me, what? Three years your senior? Show some respect.