this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
535 points (93.8% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3671 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 4 months ago (2 children)

a Herculean undertaking with too few engineers and too many standards

Yeah, as a layperson this is my take. If mozilla is struggling to stay in the game then I just don't really see how an unfinanced indie team has a shot.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Mozilla has loads of projects, not just the browser. I doubt more than a 30 work exclusively on the engine nowadays.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Even if that were true, and it seems unlikely, that's still an order of magnitude more than the ladybug devs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Let's not forget that Mozilla (the company) is largely mismanaged, so that doesn't help.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

It might seem that way but it's a fairly arrogant assertion. They're a sophisticated organisation with a lot of well experienced people guiding them. As an outsider it's easy to criticise their seemingly endless series of bad decisions, but I'm still confident that internally all of these decisions seemed like a good idea at the time.

Besides which, this would be a good reason to fork their codebase rather than starting from scratch.