this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
183 points (78.2% liked)

Memes

45689 readers
1064 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

Why not both? Cheer

A socialist foundation where every member of society has guaranteed means of survival, maybe even thriving so we uplift ourselves as a society...combined with capitalisms incentive for innovation and ambition.

Imagine what people could do if they were not exhausted by surviving, three jobs, etc. Yes there would be leeches, but that is a minority and a worthwhile sacrifice.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Socialism provides more innovation than capitalism. We would have the cure for cancer right now if profit incentive was not the drive of the economy, but to improve people’s lives.

Edit:

I suggest you to watch this video for about why combing both doesn’t work

and

this one

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Quite the hot take. Make a claim, cherry pick one thing, and post a random YouTube video to back it.

Most of our tech comes from the military inventions of decades prior. Most of that from the US military and government. So if you think socialism would have brought GPS, cell phones, home computers, rocket technology, satellites, and more to the commercial market sooner... lol.

The entire factory industry, worldwide, uses the assembly line model invented by Ford, an American company. This system also brought prices down on cars, making them a staple of life rather than a luxury.

I won't disagree with the fact big pharma could do more, but not with the idea it would have more incentive under a socialist system.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

satellites

Uh.. Sputnik?

to the commercial market

Why is the commercial market important?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Correct, the Soviets launched the first basic satellite. They haven't accomplished much since the 70s though and none of it translated to the commercial market. I won't knock them for having a solid system that could fill the gap post-shuttles. Their adversion to solid fuel rockets also has merit.

The commercial market is the public market. Not sure why I'd have to explain that level of importance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not sure why I'd have to explain

You don't have to, I've simply asked you to.

that level of importance

What level of importance? You haven't explained any level of importance.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The entire factory industry, worldwide, uses the assembly line model invented by Ford, an American company. This system also brought prices down on cars, making them a staple of life rather than a luxury.

Right, but if you have the motivation to make things affordable for people, you can and will get to the same place. The profit motivation and the centralization of wealth are not the key motivators here.

They're just the ones that made Ford rich and famous enough to aggressively publicize himself.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The motivation was to make a profit by making them affordable. Efficiency was the key Ford recognized as his means to success. If there is no profitability, he would never have bothered in bucking the current system.

You're putting the cart before the horse.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)