this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
472 points (89.7% liked)

Technology

59390 readers
2518 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

How stupid do you have to be to believe that only 8% of companies have seen failed AI projects? We can't manage this consistently with CRUD apps and people think that this number isn't laughable? Some companies have seen benefits during the LLM craze, but not 92% of them. 34% of companies report that generative AI specifically has been assisting with strategic decision making? What the actual fuck are you talking about?

....

I don't believe you. No one with a brain believes you, and if your board believes what you just wrote on the survey then they should fire you.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 126 points 4 months ago (38 children)

I had my fun with Copilot before I decided that it was making me stupider - it's impressive, but not actually suitable for anything more than churning out boilerplate.

This. Many of these tools are good at incredibly basic boilerplate that's just a hint outside of say a wizard. But to hear some of these AI grifters talk, this stuff is going to render programmers obsolete.

There's a reality to these tools. That reality is they're helpful at times, but they are hardly transformative at the levels the grifters go on about.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I use them like wikipedia: it's a good starting point and that's it (and this comparison is a disservice to wikipedia).

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yep! It’s a good way to get over the fear of a blank page, but I don’t trust it for more than outlines or summaries

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Man, I need to build some new shit.

I can't remember the last time I looked at a blank page.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Blank pages are for the young

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I wouldn't even trust it for summaries beyond extremely basic stuff.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)