this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
93 points (78.2% liked)

Privacy

31837 readers
93 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Real question. I would like to know what drives you to hate Apple? (In terms of privacy of course because in terms of price it’s another story).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

About "Security theater":

keep in mind that companies can lie on how their stuff works, also I don't think the nature of the store matters, as much as the fact that you're only allowed to get the open source apps from there which will also run on top of a proprietary OS, with proprietary firmware

Gaslighting their customers": I'd like to see hard proof on that

Consider that I have a low standard on what a hard proof should be,.. I consider telling people that : "Privacy, that's iPhone", while literally developing nothing in the open, which is the best and ONLY way to guarantee transparency, instead they went with the "trust me bruh" method, plus they display ads... like.....they have... a.. dedicated.. ad .. platform...

You don't respect my Privacy while you target me with ads

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Or being unable to install third-party apps or other browser engines is supposed to be for security reasons. Or being environment friendly through their recycling program when the truth is that they only do that to keep spare parts out of reach of independent repair shops. Pure gaslighting.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They can lie about how the advanced data encryption works…. But then they also tell you that you’re shit outta luck if you forget or screw up your decryption code. If they really had a back door, then I would expect them to take a much less hard line on you’re screwed if you lose the key.

I would be surprised if they had a back door too given how they’ve pushed back on back doors from the NSA and EU

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean they understand their encryption algorithm, they made it after all, and with the advancements of Quantum computing it could be possible to decrypt someone's data... So what good does providing quantum computing for Imessages do... If they : understand how the algorithm works + they have enough computing power to decrypt it + it's proprietary.

I wouldn't be surprised if it was all a theater, and it's the best backdoor implementation to exist

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This feels a lot like the argument of well what if they break TLS? A lot of hypotheticals when I don’t have any reason or proof to believe that they’ve made a back door

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

No, breaking an encryption is all about knowing how it works, many cryptographers make their algorithm proprietary in hopes that an attacker will have a hard time figuring how it works, however they turn out to be weak, other encryption algorithms are developed in the open so that many people look at it and see the flaws

The key word is : weak The idea is not making a backdoor directly, the idea is making it flawed, it's like securing a bank with steel doors with the exception of one door, that door is made out of wood and only you know where it's located.