this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
152 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59312 readers
5006 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
152
How Much Energy Would It Take to Pull Carbon Dioxide out of the Air? (www.wired.com)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
72 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't sound too bad.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Technically yes, but politicians start freaking out as it would lower GDP a few percent too.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think the technical term is: But muh ecomnomie!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They're going to say that anyway when the real cost of warming hits. Calculation about that says GDP -30% to -50%. But that's for the next legislature I guess.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, for politicians the cost is always lower to kick the can into the next administration's term. Unfortunately it becomes more and more expensive for the rest of us.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

In the end, they'll have kicked so many cans down the road that the huge pile is blocking the way.