this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
19 points (70.2% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
7261 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
19
Did Stanford just prototype the future of AR glasses? (www.theverge.com)
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A research team at Stanford is developing a new AI-assisted holographic imaging technology it claims is thinner, lighter, and higher quality than anything its researchers have seen.

the Stanford tech is currently just a prototype

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They already exist in much larger packaging.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They already exist in much larger packaging.

Nobody uses that stuff, though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Sure they do. Hololens is used by a large swath of major engineering firms, I've seen people use the Quests fairly extensively for AR, and Apple somehow still sold out their pretty awful AR product as well.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Of course they exist.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

So they already "happened".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

I think most people understand the difference between "existing" and "happening".

That was the whole point of the original comment.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Seems you used that word. I'm just responding to your comments.