this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
265 points (94.0% liked)

Privacy

31991 readers
734 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Proton should look who was asking the disclosure. He's a known far-right judge that opens cases like beer cans. And the "terrorist" group is marked as such because someone had a heart attack the same day there were protests in Catalonia.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Does it matter? He's still a judge with a judge's authority. If their policy is to obey the law then the political views of the judge don't change the fact that his order was lawful.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So if a Russian judge had asked the same the outcome would be the same too? Or a Chinese one?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Depends on what you mean by that:

  1. A Russian/Chinese judge ordering the disclosure of data about a Spanish citizen? Then no, because judges from one country should hold no jurisdiction over citizens of other countries (unless it's about things these citizens did in the judge's country - which is not the hypothetical case here)
  2. A Russian/Chinese born person who became a judge in Spain? Then yes, because the judge's ethnicity should not be a factor on whether or not their authority is respected.
  3. A Russian/Chinese judge ordering the disclosure of data about a Russian/Chinese (respectively) citizen? Then this depends on whether or not Proton Mail is willing to stop doing business in Russia/China (again - respectively). Though I'm not sure if that will save them, since it may still be possible, even after the cut ties with that country, for the government to go after them using international treaties.

At any rate, my point is that the decision of whether you obey the law or protect your users should be about the country as a whole, not about any specific judge employed by it. Choosing to obey some judges of the country while ignoring the warrants signed by other judges of the same country is just stupid. The country will not trust you to respect their authority and will not permit you to do business there, while the users will not trust you to keep your promise to protect them and won't use your service.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Was the heart attacked even in catalonia?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In Barcelona IIRC. Taking a flight (also IIRC)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Governments do the dumbest mental gymnastics to mark groups and individuals as undesireables.