this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
71 points (89.0% liked)

Technology

59207 readers
2939 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The only reason I haven't switched to Firefox from Chrome fully is because for some reason Firefox for Android still doesn't have tabs for large screen devices. Mozilla says it's not a priority. ๐Ÿคท

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Firefox for Android removing the ability to open local html files killed it for me. Currently on Vivaldi.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that's your only gripe with it, you can still access them by using one of the simple web servers available running inside Termux, that will also allow you to avoid CORS related problems, in fact it is the currently suggested method on MDN

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, nah. I've already got enough unnecessary apps and services with Android.

Thanks for the workaround, though.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why did they remove it though? I was surprised too when I found out I needed to run local webserver to access local html files

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It was because of 'security', which was never explained. And it doesn't make much sense when other browsers can and do alow it. I'll see if I can dig up some historical links if I remember tomorrow.

Last time I checked,there was still no acknowledgement of it and appeared to be no intention of ever addressing it. The fact that they're now telling people to run a webserver suggests that nothing has changed โ˜น๏ธ

[โ€“] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So use edge

Its chrome-based.. but at least its not brave, and the adblocker(which is off by default...) is decent enough

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If you think the things brave has done are bad, go read through the list of things microsoft has done. You really don't want them to ever have a browser again, and certainly don't want to personally use it.