this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
50 points (94.6% liked)

Memes

45660 readers
987 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (27 children)

Not everyone in capitalism is a winner, and that's ok. The big advantage is that the losers are usually offered the opportunity to work and make a living.

The alternative is crossing your fingers and hoping the government (or whatever body is responsible for distributing pay) gives you what you need. If they don't, tough luck, there's nothing you can do about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The problem is that the biggest "winners" in this case are almost exclusively the people willing to go the furthest to put profits ahead of people, which in a better system would never be incentivized.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That leads to a beauty of capitalism though. People prioritize profit, yes, but with competition, the way to make a profit is to be appealing to people. You make a profit by providing the best good or service at the best price. This means that the people who have the goal of profits also have the goal of pleasing their customers.

There's a quote from somewhere that goes something like this "capitalism takes the most ambitious, selfish, and capable people and forces them to stay up at night thinking about what everyone else wants".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

"I studied economics in high school. Hear my wisdom."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Beauty of capitalism. God fucking take me now.

Rot in hell bootlicker

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We have seem over and over again that companies will eventually become greedy and will kill all competition. One example Standard Oil , they will eventually not serve the customers as you mentioned. The customers will have to pay really high prices for lower quality service or product. I am not a lot into socialism because we come back to the same that one entity is controlling everything and we have seem also that the government sucks. So maybe a hybrid approach will be nice to try.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Insulin prices in the US is a great example of this. It's not about being competitive, it's about charging the absolute highest amount they can possibly get away with.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Insulin prices would be a lot lower if more people were allowed to produce and sell it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's not a question of not being allowed to produce it, it's anti-competitive practices by the pharmaceuticals industry, which capitalism rewards.

Specifically, drug manufacturers have repeatedly made lots of little changes to their existing insulin products in order to apply for new patents on them. This process, called “evergreening,” has discouraged competitors from developing new versions of existing insulins because they’d have to chase so many changes. This has slowed down innovation, along with “pay for delay” deals, in which insulin manufacturers pay competitors to not copy specific drugs for a period of time.

Source

Even though there are very few insulin products that have patent protection on the compound itself, the vast majority of insulin products still have patent protection on the pens and other devices that deliver the dose of insulin. Novo Nordisk has patents for Novolog, Novolin, and FIASP products; Sanofi has patents on the devices for all of its products; and Eli Lilly still has patents on some devices that deliver Humulin and Humalog.

The patent protection on the devices is significant. Because the pens and other insulin delivery devices can only be used on with one brand of insulin, competition on those products is effectively delayed. While a prospective competitor could develop a follow-on biologic or biosimilar of the insulin, it would have to develop its own delivery device.

Source

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

You are going to use medicine that some Joe made in his garage?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Monopolies are pretty dangerous, and I'd like to avoid then as much as possible.

I think that they're generally created and sustained by government intervention though. Bailouts, legal fees, red tape, price controls, exceedingly long copyrights, they all hurt new competitors more than established ones.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You should read Lenin's "Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism", you're like 2 steps from it, just in this moment you try to turn back the clock instead of looking forward.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Capitalism is the worst economic system, except for all others which have been tried

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"I went to high school. Hear my wisdom"

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you disagree, feel free to point to a superior alternative which has been demonstrated in reality

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As demonstrated by which socialist country

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

A huge range of them. If you can’t see which ones then that is not something anyone is capable of explaining to you

load more comments (24 replies)