this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
0 points (50.0% liked)

Technology

34686 readers
219 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Article summary: Japan's system is not interchangable with systems outside Japan, which is a friction point for export.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This is not a Japan problem. The only time a European system got sold outside Europe was Korea's KTX, which is a dead ringer from the TGV. The Texas Central Railway was the closest we got to seeing a Japanese bullet train and that proposal is probably dead.

Europe's rail density still promotes Intercity and Regional rail and that's a business Alstom bought into by hook or crook. And they and SNCF, DB etc fight to keep that same graded rail for their bullet trains and intercity over maglev. This isn't going to change, because speed changes stem from capacity, not technical preference. Europe doesn't have the problems Japan has with capacity stemming from density.