Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
The last thing you want to do for someone with an addiction is put up layers of deception and trickery around them.
It is 100% counterproductive.
I appreciate the intention, but don’t try to help an addict by tricking them into not getting their fix. It will not help.
How would it be tricking them? It's not like I would hide it. It's sole purpose would be to reduce the current scams already prevalent on apple and Google app stores. People will still spend their money anyway they wish but this would be an alternative to the current biz model to nickel and dime the users to death.
It sounds like taking the gambling out of gambling, by making loss impossible.
I guess as long as you’re open about it, like “instead of gambling you can do this other thing”.
But if returning the money is a surprise thing, that’s bad. It means they didn’t consent to the actual game they were playing.
I’ve been an addict and I used the harm of my own addiction as part of my own wake-up process. Anyone reducing harm would have just been giving my inner addict justification for continuing.
I was in a dance with my subconscious, trying to avoid pain but also trying to wake up, and I repeatedly steered myself down, in aikido with my addict self, to steer toward moments of clarity.
But maybe I read the post wrong. If you’re totally up front about “The money will be returned to you later”, it’s cool. Like non-alcoholic beer is cool so long as it’s labeled as such.