this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
151 points (94.2% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3846 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
151
Wikipedia is gauging interest for an extension that uses AI to see if any claim is cited on Wikipedia (meta.wikimedia.org)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A prototype is available, though it's Chrome-only and English-only at the moment. How this'll work is you select some text and then click on the extension, which will try to "return the relevant quote and inference for the user, along with links to article and quality signals".

How this works is it uses ChatGPT to generate a search query, utilizes WP's search API to search for relevant article text, and then uses ChatGPT to extract the relevant part.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not sure where the not-working is here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Where do you see it working? I see the result:

There were no results matching the query.

The extension mentioned in the post is supposed to:

return the relevant quote and inference for the user, along with links to article and quality signals

I don't see any relevant quotes, or links to articles, or quality signals.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, because there is no relevant Wikipedia information about what you searched for.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You are 100% sure that there is no mention of Wikipedia being integrated into Firefox/Chrome in any page? How thoroughly have you checked?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Due to Russell's Teapot, I cannot be thoroughly sure of that, at least in article space. However, that does not mean your claim stands, unless you find a mention.

In principle, the media has no reason to cover this, so no mention should exist.