this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
575 points (83.5% liked)

Memes

45560 readers
1196 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 44 points 7 months ago (86 children)

Not the same thing, dog. Being inspired by other things is different than plagiarism.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (36 children)

Humans learn from other creative works, just like AI. AI can generate original content too if asked.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

LLM AI doesn’t learn. It doesn’t conceptualise. It mimics, iterates and loops. AI cannot generate original content with LLM approaches.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Interesting take on LLMs, how are you so sure about that?

I mean I get it, current image gen models seem clearly uncreative, but at least the unrestricted versions of Bing Chat/ChatGPT leave some room for the possibility of creativity/general intelligence in future sufficiently large LLMs, at least to me.

So the question (again: to me) is not only "will LLM scale to (human level) general intelligence", but also "will we find something better than RLHF/LLMs/etc. before?".

I’m not sure on either, but asses roughly a 2/3 probability to the first and given the first event and AGI in reach in the next 8 years a comparatively small chance for the second event.

load more comments (34 replies)
load more comments (83 replies)