"Stop calling my website pro-Nazi" says man constantly saying pro-Nazi things on said website.
this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
94 points (86.7% liked)
Technology
59421 readers
3519 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Did anyone say discovery?
I'd say break out the popcorn, but I've rather had my fill over the last few years...
in some ways it’s a dream come true for the people at Media Matters because it could allow them to use the litigation discovery process to force X to divulge all sorts of embarrassing, damaging private information that it would much rather keep secret.
deleted
Yeah and I'm loving it! Such massive arrogant hubris is pretty much the only way the immensely powerful are ever accidentally held to account and it's the best schadenfreude there is! 
Not a single authentic user on X saw IBM’s, Comcast’s, or Oracle’s ads next to the content in Media Matters’ article.”
So you do have pro-Nazi content on your service that you are not removing and allowing paid advertisers to appear next to.
Also that sounds like only bots saw the traffic, which means the advertising is doubly useless
Profile named after a Nazi, with a profile picture of a Nazi, posting pro-Nazi tweets. It doesn't get much clearer than that.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The lawsuit filed Monday accuses Media Matters of distorting how likely it is for ads to appear beside extremist content on X, alleging that the group’s testing methodology was not representative of how real users experience the site.
A number of major companies stopped their advertising on the platform after Musk endorsed the antisemitic claim that Jewish communities push “hatred against Whites.”
Discovery, halted their advertising on X. Musk threatened a “thermonuclear lawsuit” against Media Matters and “ALL those who colluded in this fraudulent attack on our company,” including, he said in a follow-up post, “their board, their donors, their network of dark money, all of them…”
Ken White, a First Amendment lawyer and criminal defense attorney based in Los Angeles, said the decision to file in Texas may have been intended to circumvent laws passed by California, the District of Columbia and dozens of states barring frivolous lawsuits meant to stifle public criticism.
“X filed this in federal court in Texas to avoid application of an anti-SLAPP statute,” White said on the X alternative BlueSky, using the acronym that refers to so-called “strategic lawsuits against public participation.”
Monday’s case has been assigned to District Judge Mark Pittman, a Donald Trump appointee who has previously been at the center of some of the nation’s biggest legal battles.
The original article contains 921 words, the summary contains 217 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!