this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
173 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59390 readers
2840 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Don't be fooled: Net neutrality is about more than just blocking and throttling::The net neutrality debate has huge implications beyond the reductive "blocking and throttling" buzzwords that ISPs use to characterize it.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Couple points:

The issue isn’t “net neutrality.” The issue isn’t even about an “open internet.” The issue that is once again before the FCC is whether those that run the most powerful and pervasive platform in the history of the planet will be accountable for behaving in a “just and reasonable” manner.

Absolutely true. The Internet is essentially a basic utility at this point and those managing it should have accountability, like other basic services, like water... I'd say "or electricity" but I live in PG&E territory...

Second point:

Mischaracterizing net neutrality as “blocking, throttling, and paid prioritization” also creates an opening for ISPs to proclaim they are now against such practices. “We do not block, slow down or discriminate against lawful content,” Comcast’s web page proclaims.

This is disingenuous on so many fucking levels. Sure, Comcast doesn't slow anything down anymore, but they do offer the Peacock streaming service for free on certain tiers, which naturally incentivizes you towards watching those shows rather than paying for a second service. T-Mobile used to do the same thing with Netflix, I remember. This is still a violation.

Anyway, once the FCC does its best to keep the Internet from being a shithole, who do we yell at until it's considered actually a basic utility and prices come down and it's available to literally all Americans?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anyway, once the FCC does its best to keep the Internet from being a shithole, who do we yell at until it's considered actually a basic utility and prices come down and it's available to literally all Americans?

Congress and the President.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

State and local governments, too. In a lot of cases, it's state governments making laws prohibiting municipal broadband, and municipalities signing franchise agreements to create local ISP monopolies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Excellent point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good points here. I mostly agree. Just wanted to mention one counter point. Having it as utility might not be so great. It stunts growth. I mean when did any utility service ever made a great innovative improvement. It has no incentive to improve. It just exists. Also, they are more regulated by government.

I want net neutrality for other reasons, but stopping them from diverting traffic is on my lowest priority.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but it's also pretty much essential now