this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
764 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

68349 readers
3645 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US experts who work in artificial intelligence fields seem to have a much rosier outlook on AI than the rest of us.

In a survey comparing views of a nationally representative sample (5,410) of the general public to a sample of 1,013 AI experts, the Pew Research Center found that "experts are far more positive and enthusiastic about AI than the public" and "far more likely than Americans overall to believe AI will have a very or somewhat positive impact on the United States over the next 20 years" (56 percent vs. 17 percent). And perhaps most glaringly, 76 percent of experts believe these technologies will benefit them personally rather than harm them (15 percent).

The public does not share this confidence. Only about 11 percent of the public says that "they are more excited than concerned about the increased use of AI in daily life." They're much more likely (51 percent) to say they're more concerned than excited, whereas only 15 percent of experts shared that pessimism. Unlike the majority of experts, just 24 percent of the public thinks AI will be good for them, whereas nearly half the public anticipates they will be personally harmed by AI.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

How did they answer the question about rock and roll being a fad?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 hours ago

For once, most Americans are right.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I dont believe AI will ever be more than essentially a parlar trick that fools you into thinking it's intelligent when it's really just a more advanced tool like excel compared to pen and paper or an abacus.

The real threat will be people who fool themselves into thinking it's more than that and that it's word is law, like a diety. Or worse, the people that do understand that but like various religious and political leaders that used religion to manipulate people, the new AI Pope's will try and do the same manipulation but with AI.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago

It should. We should have radically different lives today because of technology. But greed keeps us in the shit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

New cascadeur update just killed inbetweenjng jobs if its as good as the trailer, but uh I think this is a case where ai good, like yeah jobs lost but the time saved is wild for indie animators

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So far AI has only aggravated me by interrupting my own online activities.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

First thing I do is disable it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

When Miyazaki said the AI ghiblifier is an affront to art, I couldn’t help but think that before WW1, tanks were called an affront to horsemanship.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 12 hours ago

All it took was for us to destroy our economy using it to figure that out!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (6 children)

https://www.sesame.com/research/crossing_the_uncanny_valley_of_voice#demo

Try this voice AI demo on your phone, then imagine if it can create images and video.

This in my opinion changes every system of information gathering that we have, and will usher in an era of geniuses, who grew up with access to the answer to their every question in a granular pictorial video response. If you want to for example learn how white blood cells work it gives you ask your chatbot for a video, and you can then tell it to put in different types of bacteria to see the response. Its going to make a lot of systems we have now obsolete.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

This is another level, thanks for sharing!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Holy shit, that AI chat is too good.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Maybe that's because every time a new AI feature rolls out, the product it's improving gets substantially worse.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe that's because they're using AI to replace people, and the AI does a worse job.

Meanwhile, the people are also out of work.

Lose - Lose.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Even if you're not "out of work", your work becomes more chaotic and less fulfilling in the name of productivity.

When I started 20 years ago, you could round out a long day with a few hours of mindless data entry or whatever. Not anymore.

A few years ago I could talk to people or maybe even write a nice email communicating a complex topic. Now chatGPT writes the email and I check it.

It's just shit honestly. I'd rather weave baskets and die at 40 years old of a tooth infection than spend an additional 30 years wallowing in self loathing and despair.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

30 years ago I did a few months of 70 hour work weeks, 40 doing data entry in the day, then another 30 stocking grocery shelves in the evening - very different kinds of work and each was kind of a "vacation" from the other. Still got old quick, but it paid off the previous couple of months' travel / touring with no income.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 22 hours ago

It didn't even need to take someone's job. A summary of an article or paper with hallucinated information isn't replacing anyone, but it's definitely making search results worse.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 day ago (12 children)

The first thing seen at the top of WhatsApp now is an AI query bar. Who the fuck needs anything related to AI on WhatsApp?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

Android Messages and Facebook Messenger also pushed in AI as 'something you can chat with'

I'm not here to talk to your fucking chatbot I'm here to talk to my friends and family.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 127 points 1 day ago (15 children)

If it was marketed and used for what it's actually good at this wouldn't be an issue. We shouldn't be using it to replace artists, writers, musicians, teachers, programmers, and actors. It should be used as a tool to make those people's jobs easier and achieve better results. I understand its uses and that it's not a useless technology. The problem is that capitalism and greedy CEOs are ruining the technology by trying to replace everyone but themselves so they can maximize profits.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›