this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
300 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

68306 readers
4439 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago

As long as there is opensource, good luck with that. Remember the export-restricted pgp?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

My question is: even if EU manages to apply laws for backdooring encryption, wouldn't cybercriminals just use different tools? They may force Signal to backdoor its encryption, but what about Briar? Will they backdoor the Tor network? Will they ban it entirely? What about Matrix? They can't prevent offshore encrypted instances.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 17 hours ago

Bingo! It's simply surveillance of the masses.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Signal said they will just pull out of any country that demands a back door.

Back doors don't work. Just ask American telecom companies to talk about how easy it was to get Salt Typhoon out of their back door.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, means Signal would just not have a presence eg an office or local routing/CDN servers in the countries that demand backdoors.

It would mean slower service for anyone in such countries, but the service would not stop working or become less secure.

It's negative either way, as it chips away at the legitimacy of private E2E chat, and legislators the world over seemed determined not to learn that there's no such think as "backdoors, but just for the good guys". You either have a resilient end-to-end zero trust encrypted system or you don't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Would hosting in Albania be a solution? It's in the Europe continent, but it's not a member of European Union. UK is also fighting encrypted communications.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago

"the eu is becoming a bastion of privacy"

yeah my ass

[–] [email protected] 106 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There really should be a law where the EU gets fined everytime they waste time bringing up the same proposal that has already been shut down multiple times.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Porke nos los dos? (Or something, my Spanish is rusty)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 20 hours ago

You want to do what with two lost pigs?

[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I almost forgot the monthly "let's make encryption illegal" from the EU.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

It's sad and against our supposed values. Who proposed this this time? Was it the same MEP?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

This comes from the Commission, not Parliament.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

let's make encryption illegal*

*for the peasantry, of course.

They really love the idea of giving the political class an exception.