this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
126 points (74.0% liked)

Technology

60530 readers
5151 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

All the stories on the FP are about labor relations and corporate shenanigans. So anyway, do you like Star Trek or Star Wars better? Anybody still ike to read old school sci fi, for example I really love Poul Anderson's Polesotechnic League stories - the swashbuckling adventures of intersteller trador Nicholas van Rijn and his Solar Spice and Liquors company, David Falkayne, et al. Good old basic space opera.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Back in the days of Star trek the next generation, Voyager and Deep Space 9, I Would say Star Wars is not really Science Fiction but Science Fantasy.
But unfortunately that's become true for Star Trek too.

As Science Fiction I clearly prefer old school Star Trek, but as Science Fantasy Star Wars does it way better IMO.

I hadn't heard about Poul Anderson’s Polesotechnic League stories before, they look very interesting, I'll bookmark that for when I feel like some old school SciFi. πŸ‘ πŸ˜€

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, Star Trek always had its fantasy element as well. They dressed it up with Treknobabble a lot, but many of the episodes had fundamentally fantasy elements as well. Like, remember the time Kirk gets beamed down to a planet where the inhabitants use literal, actual magic and it turns out the Salem witches were actual witches?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

You are absolutely correct, I'd also argue Q is more fantasy than SciFi, it's probably more correct to say Star Trek was MOSTLY SciFi, while Star Wars had more fantasy elements as a fundamental part of the Universe that are the basis for the stories.

Personally I consider time travel as absolutely a fantasy element, I see no reason to believe the past and future exist at the same "time" as the present. Which makes time travel basically nonsense.
All time travel speculation quickly ends out in either infinities or paradoxes. Only a very careful author, who set up strict limitations prevent that.
To be honest I'm extremely tired of all the time travel babble Star Trek has turned into, where time travel is a key element of the stories.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

'War Of The Wing-Men' is a good one to start with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Thanks. I just found the entire series, πŸ˜‹ but with some odd numbering?:

Anderson, Poul - Polesotechnic League - 01 - The Trouble Twisters
Anderson, Poul - Polesotechnic League - 02 - War Of The Wing-Men
Anderson, Poul - Polesotechnic League - 03 - Trader To The Stars
Anderson, Poul - Polesotechnic League - 04 - Satan's World
Anderson, Poul - Polesotechnic League - 05 - Mirkheim
Anderson, Poul - Polesotechnic League - 06 - The Earth Book Of Stormgate
Anderson, Poul - Polesotechnic League - People in the Wind

Completely different numbering than for instance the recommended here?

https://www.bookseriesinorder.com/polesotechnic-league/

Which would you recommend?
By publication date or chronological story line?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I always try to go by publication.

Someone put it this way [they were talking specifically about the Conan stories]. If you meet someone and get to chatting you don't tell your story in chronological order. Maybe the first story you tell is about what happened at work, or your most recent vacation. After you've known them a while you talk about grade school.

That's my opinion.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Thanks. πŸ˜€

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Poul Anderson mentioned πŸ—£οΈ πŸ—£οΈπŸ—£οΈ

He and H.Beam Piper are my favorite SF writers, be sure to check Three Hearts and Three Lions, the book where the hero solves fantasy problems with Science(tm).

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (3 children)

What boggles my mind is that there have been about fifty movies based on Philip K. Dick and zero based on Poul Anderson.

Anderson has galactic empires, roguish heroes, dozens of alien species, strong females, etc etc.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think that it because Dick could write short stories that could get made into movies. A lot more of the sprawling book series are only done justice with multi movie series or TV series.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Poul did a throwaway story that I'd love to see expanded into a series.

A group of time travelers from 4,000 AD travel back to Renaissance Italy. They run into an evil baron and his henchmen, including one very learned monk. A little torture and the Italians have their own time machine. They set up a base in 10,000 BC and raid across time. They know that the Time Patrol can only use things in the historical record, so as long as they keep a low profile they'll never get caught.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

PKD is special somehow. He's the one author where, I think, the movies are better than the books pretty consistently. Maybe it's luck or my flawed opinion.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

I think Dick was writing to be read in a particular time and place. Take Dashiell Hammett. 'Red Harvest' works a century later. there are some references that are dated [wearing a red tie] but overall you can give the novel to a modern person without a great deal of explanation needed. 'The Thin Man' requires a ton of annotation to be understood.

imho.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Agreed. Partly because the movies have actual endings...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I have just read one Poul Anderson (when I was a teenager) and the most important thing I remember was people fucking each other all the time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

New age sci-fi, but you have GOT to read the Murder Bot books. They are absolutely incredible. They've also won Nebula and Hugo awards.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Also: children of time series, as well as the bobiverse series

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I haven't read Children of Ruin yet, but Children of Time was awesome.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Ruin is awesome. The story is like going on an adventure.

People are split on Memory, but I like it. It's just written differently

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

I have a soft spot for star wars but only the first 3, probably because I was young and it was so breathtaking.

So now I roll with star trek, especially the older ones.

But back on track, Where are the robots? The DIY? The fun stuff. Where are posts about a new ESP32? Some portable 3D printer (probably garbage, lets have a flame war!), how to use phone chargers to get 20 vilts to your led strip, funky homelab setups and deals, better network stuff, even retro computing I'd say.

Yeah, block all the boardroom chatter and bring back real tech!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I just started reading the dune series, after watching the movies, and I'm having a great time with it! Somehow the books do a better job of detailing the conversations between all the different characters, and setting the stage for movie 2.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'd put 'The Expanse' at the head of the line

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

The Expanse is great

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Star Trek for the technology and exploration (both of space and the human condition). Star Wars because WOW that dude just moved that shit with his FREAKIN' MIND!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Think about the technology we have now - a lot of it was inspired by Star Trek technology. Communicators -> smartphones/watches, shuttle -> Rovers, non invasive medical diagnosis, large screens, video calls. And that's just from TOS. And I'm pretty sure people are still working on creating Transporters.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

I've tried star wars. Just didn't like it like I do star trek

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Love TNG and DS9, currently reading the Ringworld series

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Not a fan of either but I did enjoy watching Lost in space recently. Also enjoyed reading Neuromancer

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

seveneves was a banger, if you haven't read it just go in hot.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Everything I needed to learn about SciFi I learned from watching Prisoners Of Gravity on TVO. The host Rick Green was always interesting to listen to. I learned there was far more scifi than just TrekWars

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί