this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
71 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

59390 readers
3724 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Models trained on large data sets of seismic events can estimate the number of aftershocks better than conventional models do.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So it’s more accurate at predicting but they don’t say how much more accurate.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The footnotes link to the scientific papers being written about, so you can read them if you want more detailed information.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s just disappointing Nature coverage. I shouldn’t have to read the footnotes as well.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Unsurprising. Needs further study to establish reliability, but this is a textbook case where predictive AI would excel.