I hope Lina Kahn goes after them for this BS. They have a monopoly on the browser market and they're exploiting that to further their own interests in the advertising industry.
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
425 points (98.4% liked)
Technology
58727 readers
4182 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This is a pretty textbook definition of monopoly abuse.
I can't see them keeping control of chrome as this goes forward.
lol. Obligatory “you guys use chromium?”
People you can still block the shit of using DNS Adblockers . There are a some free like Mullvad DNS and Adguard.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Honest question here, since chromium (vs chrome) is open source, can someone not fork an older version, or remove the new code blocking ublock?
I mean i assume it cant be done, but i dont know why
It can be done, but then whoever forks that will need to stay on top of keeping that fork up to date with other changes in the original chromium, and that gets harder and harder to do as time goes on and more changes are made to the same or related parts of the codebase.
And you have to know that if anyone actually tried, they would dedicate their infinite resources to making that as difficult as humanly possible.
Google: We changed a color
Fork Developer: they changed a color and it caused 50,000 breaking changes that a diff tool can't handle automatically wtf.
Google: sorry wrong color here's a new one
Fork developer: another 100,000 breaking changes that a diff can't handle?!?!
I don't know why either. What I do know is that most Chromium browsers that are not Chrome have ad-blocking built into the browser itself using the same strategies as uBo but not reliant on Mv2 or Mv3 because they're not extensions.
Doesn't Vivaldi have built-in blockers?
Yes, but it's neither as good at adblocking as UBlock Origin or as fully featured.
It kills the full version of uBlock but there is a lite version that has fewer functions as well.
For now. And Google super mega promises to never rug pull that one.
Oh great. Back to sucking Google’s teat for me then!
I still hope as part of the antitrust ruling, they rip chrome from Google and undo this crap.
I've had good luck with uBlock Lite.
(Yes I could swap browsers but nah).
load more comments
(2 replies)