this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
33 points (90.2% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3392 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
33
DMCA Notice Targeting ‘Bypass Paywalls Clean’ Isn’t The Thing to Get Angry About (torrentfreak.com)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago

I have a simple opinion on paywall bypassers:

If it's possible to bypass the paywall, that means there's already a class of unauthenticated clients you're allowing to see it. I have no interest in complying with whatever infrastructure you use to implement this discrimination.

Implementing a true hard paywall is trivial software. The only reason bypassing is possible is because they're trying to have their cake and eat it too by allowing (eg) search engines to see it unauthenticated.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago

While that could be a worthy topic of discussion, these scenarios can be immediately addressed using a DMCA counter-notice. BPC’s creator can simply file one with GitLab and in less than two weeks’ time, the platform would have to restore it, if whoever sent the original notice didn’t sue the developer in the United States.

Who is the author of this piece suggesting pays for that potential lawsuit? Like, it's great to say "Oh, they can totally fight this, and they're probably in the right to do so", but companies weaponizing the legal system is basically trivial for them to do, and unless they're offering to help foot that bill, they're putting all the risk on the developer which isn't really fair.