this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
-52 points (17.5% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35427 readers
452 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

News websites wanting to charge you money in order to read their articles. πŸ’΅

IT'S A BASIC HUMAN RIGHT FOR F*CKS SAKE!!

Edit: I've seen some people have commented about other stuff that really grinds their gears. Just wanted to say, go ahead and take it out. πŸ‘

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Since when is access to news a human right?

But you have always needed to pay for news, well before the internet, either directly or indirectly

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was created on December 10th, 1948.

Here's a link related to Article 19 (the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers):

https://www.unesco.org/en/right-information

And while you do have a point when it comes to the history of paying for the news, i think there's a clear distinction between paying for a paper newsletter or Cable TV, and having to pay for a small, individual article, no more than 2 pages long. (Because let's be real, so far there are no news websites worth paying a subscription for).

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It also describes a right to own property but I don’t think that anyone would argue that you should receive that property for free.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Housing is an example of property given freely in Socialist states such as the USSR and PRC.

Hell, if even North Korea can do it, why can't we?

It may be nice having rights like that, but if you can't even exercise them, what's the point to begin with if your material conditions remain untouched?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

We live under capitalism. When profits are threatened, human rights go out the window.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You want free news? You get ai generated articles which cover the basics... hopefully.

You want good news? You have to pay.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or you could go to npr and pbs. Public, free journalism

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, my country also has decent public journalism channels

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then your first comment about free news just being ai garbage meant nothing?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It is a dramatization, call it artist freedom. Things are never entirely black and white in real life. In real life everything is a grey area, but it's no fun to make elaborate and nuanced statements on an internet forum where short form is the leading narative. Most people won't even read a comment or a post that has more than three sentences. Also, you shouldn't take a short message like this as fact. I, for instance, always assume short comments are written on the toilet. That'll put things in perspective a bit. Only once someone takes the effort to make a proper write up with actual sources included, where you can see there's an actually effort made, than you can start thinking about truths and facts. Otherwise it's just fun or an opinion at best.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I call it bullshit then. You put an opinion out there that you dont believe and you know isn't true "because it's fun", and you'd rather get attention than be real.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes it is that black and white. You are right and I am wrong. Congratulations!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Your wording reminds me of this scene πŸ˜†

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So... Which news website has good news again?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'd say, a combination of publicly funded news sources, like bbc, pbs and reuters. Which are free sources, so that kindof disproves my point, but these do mostly cover the basics. Local news or news about stuff you're interested in, is usually not covered there.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

News websites, most of which were and still are papers, have used sales and subscriptions to pay for journalists since they first bought printing presses. Ads have never been enough to keep them afloat.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

You know what really grinds my gears?

Entitlement.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You know what really grinds my gears?

Someone not pushing the clutch all the way in when changing gear?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Oohhh whenever i hear something like that...

The other driver has to change his route to the hospital πŸ₯

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Me not easing off the pedals enough when changing gears on an internal hub bike... and then hearing the hub fully engage the new gear later on with crunching noises πŸ₯΄πŸ₯΄

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Most of them will just put up a soft-paywall, which are rather easy to get around. Sometimes as easy as clearing your cookies (or using an incognito tab).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That hasn't been my case sadly :(

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It depends on the site but there's a few different ways to get around it. For example I didn't even realize business insider had a paywall because somehow my AdBlock removes it. Some websites work with 12ft.io but lots block it now. If it's one of the websites that give a limited amount of free articles open it in private browsing mode. And for others archive links seem to work.