this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
71 points (94.9% liked)

Privacy

31939 readers
811 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 89 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Apple is ~~bringing~~ being forced to allow sideloading and alternate app stores to the iPhone

FTFY

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago

That's exactly what I was thinking. It's incredible how the article title tries to spin it...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

this is the stuff my nerd heart wishes my government could do for us... maybe it's time to move, lol

[–] [email protected] 32 points 9 months ago (4 children)

All apps must be “notarized” by Apple

Is that legal?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago

That has to violate the spirit of the law at the very least.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Considering how many technicalities Apple is weaseling through right now, it's probably the most legal thing in existence.

Of course, legality does not mean morality, and in this case I would argue it's the opposite

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Sideloading is explicitly about enabling the user to install multimedia and apps that are not approved by the manufacturer or OS vendor, so this is probably illegal (depends on how the law's been written) and I expect Apple to be taken to court over it in the very near future.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

How I hope you are right

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

"I will make it legal".

-Mr. Cook

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I read that sideloading won't be possible, app stores have to certify and apps as well and Kommission has to be paid to Apple even for alternative stores.

So: 👎

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

50ct for each install. That's a joke.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago

Apple is being forced to tolerate users controlling their own phones, and is kicking and screaming the whole way.

Don't phrase this like they did it out of love. They're trying not to do it at all.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Today, Apple announced how it plans to change the rules for developers releasing iOS software in the European Union in response to the bloc’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) coming into force in March.

Developers can either choose to use these new business terms or stick with the existing model and continue to distribute through the App Store as normal.

The App Store itself is also opening up to allow game streaming services globally, which, until now, have been all but banned under Apple’s existing policies.

Earlier this week, Spotify — a longtime critic of Apple’s 30 percent commission rate — announced plans to bring in-app purchases back to its iOS app to let users upgrade subscriptions or buy audiobooks in the EU after the DMA comes into force.

Passed in 2022, the DMA is the EU’s strongest attempt yet to rein in the alleged anticompetitive practices of Big Tech companies, which the regulation refers to as “gatekeepers.” The EU designated Apple as a gatekeeper last September and listed its App Store, Safari browser, and iOS operating system as “core platform services” that would have to comply with the DMA’s rules.

As well as designating iOS, Safari, and the App Store as core platform services, the European Commission also opened an investigation into whether iMessage should be included (which would include having to make it interoperable with rivals), but reports suggest it might avoid being designated, and today’s announcement from Apple makes no mention of changes coming to iMessage.


The original article contains 1,199 words, the summary contains 248 words. Saved 79%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Sure they should be allowing it, but anyone who cares about digital privacy and freedom that's still using apple devices kinda deserves what they get at this point.